FREDRead a chart
Tested patterns · Buy setup

Does the liquidity sweep (bull) work? Tested on 119,186 trades

Not on its own, and Fred hasn't found a version that works yet. Across 119,186 liquidity sweep (bull) trades on 8 markets from 2020 to 2026, after real broker spreads, the setup averaged −9% of the risk per trade (−£0.93 per £10 risked) and reached a 1.5× take profit 34% of the time.

What it is: The latest candle dips below the lowest low of the previous ~20 candles, then closes back above it, green.

Older years vs recent years

2020 to 2023: −7% per trade over 65,903 trades. 2024 to 2026: −12% per trade over 53,283 trades.

Is there a version that works?

Not yet. Fred hasn't found a market, timeframe and time of day where this setup made money in both 2020–23 and 2024–26. If it shows on your chart, Fred will say so and rate it amber or red.

Got a chart open? Upload a screenshot and Fred checks it against six years of tests.

Read my chart free

5 free reads. For learning and demo practice. Not financial advice.

By market

MarketTradesPer tradeHit take profit
US30 (Dow)15,813−5%35.7%
Gold (XAUUSD)16,375−6%35.4%
USDJPY14,895−7%35.2%
EURUSD16,891−10%34.1%
NAS100 (Nasdaq)4,763−11%33.4%
AUDUSD16,956−12%33.3%
GBPUSD17,274−12%32.7%
GBPJPY16,219−13%32%

By timeframe

ChartTradesPer tradeHit take profit
5-minute84,067−11%33.5%
15-minute28,301−6%35%
1-hour6,818−4%36.7%

How Fred tested it

Every time the setup appeared on MT5 price history from 2020 to 2026, Fred entered at the next candle's open, paid the real spread, placed the stop just past the pattern (plus half an average candle) and a take profit 1.5 times the risk. If neither was hit within 48 candles, the trade closed at the last price. "Per trade" is the average result as a share of the amount risked.

Back-tested results, not live trading. Past results don't guarantee future ones. Checked 28 October 2026. All tested patterns · AI chart tools compared